Hello Tim, all,
Le 2014-03-11 15:25, Kracked_P_P---webmaster a écrit :
The new website design decided to change the things. Wording included.
"Fresh" now refers to the version that is not as "stable" as the
current line you are using and is currently for the more "adventurous"
users. Right now your Mom is using the "current" 4.1.x line that is
at 4.1.5. The "Fresh" version/line is at 4.2.1 and is meant for those
more adventurous early adopters, and not people like your Mom [most
likely].
Well, that is your own judgement and perception. That is also the
judgement of the person who started the thread -I'm fine with that-
however: Fresh is supposed to convey the meaning of new. Stable
means... stable, but really stable.
But remember: both are stable anyway, otherwise they would not be
released, and they would be called betas, or release candidates, etc.
Yes, you know this, but I think we really need to find a better words
to replace "Fresh" and "Stable".
There was a discussion on this on the marketing list. I really did not
pull it out of my head....
Others may not and need to be given
a "warning" that the newest version of the 4.2.x line is not for those
users that do not like to be an "early adopter" or something like
that. Most "moms and dads" would not.
Again, that is your own perception. You define a type of user that may
exist, but plenty of other people can enjoy the fresh version with no
worries at all. Again, the fresh version is a stable but more recent
version of the new branch. Or are you suggesting that Most "moms and
dads" are using the Firefox ESR and not the most recent and stable
version (the 27)?
I know mine would not.
Mine happily use the fresh one...
Most
of the people who live in my apartment building would not either.
In April 4.1.6 will be out and that will be the end of the 4.1.x line.
Then, when 4.2.x gets to 4.2.4, a lot of users switch over that that
line.
Personally, I would let you Mom know that she should update to 4.1.5.
That is what I am currently using, both on Windows and Linux.
As for the automatically forwarding to the "Fresh" page, other will
need to look at that.
That was in the specs. And others will need to look at that : well we
have always pushed the new branch first. Ever since the beginning of the
project. And this is only following the line, so to speak. The moment
I'll be told by the board to switch to the old branch as the default
I'll do it, but that will be some major piece of news to me and many
others.
I am one of those people who think the download
page system should not go to the "early adopter"
Tim: you call it the early adopter version. We don't. It is NOT an early
adopter version. An early adopter version is the beta we are releasing,
and the daily builds you can also download in the download section. On
top of this, Libreoffice is an office suite. Not a brand new type of web
service or a space shuttle. An early adopter of an office suite is
someone living in the eighties or perhaps the nineties. Now we have
users who have the need for ultra stable versions (like professionals)
and people who can use the most recent, yet stable version. Early
adopters is something we are constantly looking for as they help us test
the suite before it becomes.... fresh.
version of
LibreOffice. It currently should go to 4.1.5 and inform you that
4.2.1 exists and that is it for those who are more adventurous users
who would like to be an "early adopter" of the new line.
Again, see my point above. That's your own perception and it goes
against everything we do. Our most recent branch is not the unstable
branch. It's not a beta version. It's a stable version that's stable
enough to be released as such.
Best,
Charles.
In a few
months, the 4.3.x line will be started and then it will be for the
early adopters, while the 4.2.x line will be at the "more stable"
stage with versions 4.2.4 or 4.2.5 available for download.
On 03/11/2014 07:12 AM, Johannes Dewender wrote:
Hello LibreOffice Website Guys,
My mom got a notification in LibreOffice that an LibreOffice 4.1.5 is
available (she had 4.1.3 or similar). The only choice was a manual
update which opened the browser at
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/
which automatically forwarded to
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
And there was a "LibreOffice Fresh" 4.2.1 available.
So two confusions arose:
1. What the Heck is "LibreOffice Fresh"?
2. Why are (normal) users advised to go for 4.1.5, but the website
redirects to 4.2.1?
To be precise on the Naming/Explaining inconsistency:
I could not find "LibreOffice Fresh" explained anywhere. The string
just appears. Not even one sentence what this is about.
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/ introduces 4.2.*
but also no mentioning of "Fresh".
Additionally the usage of that "string" isn't even at all consistent:
At
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
on the bottom I see 4.1.5 *and* 4.2.1 listed as "stable".
Under
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/?type=rpm-x86_64&version=4.1.5&lang=en-US
you do get 4.1.5 under the "LibreOffice Fresh" label.
Anyways, the idea to have an early adopters version labeled
"LibreOffice Fresh" is fine, but that needs to be communicated!
Yes, some users wouldn't care if it says "LibreOffice Trojan Edition"
and install it anyways, but others actually do read what it says and
get more and more confused the more they try to find out what this
means.
Greetings
JonnyJD
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.