Hi Christian, *,
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 02:35:09 schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
Hi Andreas, *,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Andreas Mantke <maand@gmx.de> wrote:
The new site is currently available at
http://kermit.documentfoundation.org:9089/LibreOffice-Extensions-and-Temp
lates/
There is currently no content inside this new site (no extensions or
templates) and only a placeholder home page.
There is a dummy-entry now and that makes me complain loudly:
http://kermit.documentfoundation.org:9089/LibreOffice-Extensions-and-Templa
tes/libreoffice-extensions-center/test-2
* No Licence specified → This absolutely must be mandatory for the repo!
License is "hidden" in the "read more" for the specific release, but
not right in front.
* Same for Author/Provider/Publisher
I will look in this later.
If you have license by release, make it part of the table on the
description page please. And also provide it on the search results
page. This is very relevant information after all.
Screenshots are free-form editable in the description text? (you
definitely need to be able to provide screenshots/a logo)
This is posible. I added a logo and a screenshot and had to look into it later, why
the screenshot is not displayed yet.
And the self-certification points are very, very vague. What is the
reason behind it? Why have them at all?
It is the default of Plone Software Center yet. We can change the categories. I want
to discuss this here.
The developer of the extension surely follows his own coding standards →
checked The extension works on his own computer, he can install and
uninstall → checked End-user documentation? Heck my extension is so simple
it doesn't need documentation :-)
I showed this list here to engage you (and otheres) to provide better categories ;-)
Unit Tests? What user will know what that is supposed to mean...
Internationalized... Probably means "UI is available in the following
languages..." for most part, no real i18n...
There is no description about the categories available. We had to define our own
categories and describe them.
So there' no relevant info for the end-user IMHO.
That's what we should improve together.
Regards,
Andreas
--
## Developer LibreOffice
## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows
## http://LibreOffice.org
## Support the Document Foundation (http://documentfoundation.org)
## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
[libreoffice-website] Re: Extension review / legalese (was: Re: LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website) · Thorsten Behrens
Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website · Christian Lohmaier
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.