Hi admins, all,
I tried to send a link to get a specific mail (in order to reply in the
thread) and found something interesting:
The mail message number at the TDF mail archive is not the message
number in the mails header and thus not the one to be used to get a
specific mail.
Example:
If you want to get the last mail Christian sent to this list, just have
a look in the archive - it is this mail:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/msg05319.html
But the mails header tells me as Return-Path:
website+bounces-5336-bernhard=familie-dippold.at@global.libreoffice.org
And I would get the mail by sending an empty mail to
website+get-5336@global.libreoffice.org
So here is the difference 17 mails.
On the design list it's 8 mails:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/msg02422.html refers
to (Return-Path)
design+bounces-2430-bernhard=familie-dippold.at@global.libreoffice.org
and can be got via design+get-2430@global.libreoffice.org
Are there some mails stripped from the archives?
Perhaps test mails from the first beginning?
Should we provide consistent mail numbers, allowing people to refer to
the right mail numbers from the archive?
Best regards
Bernhard
design+get-2430@global.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-website] Wrong message count in TDF mail archive? · Bernhard Dippold
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.