Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Volker, *
On 26/02/2011 12:54, Volker Heggemann wrote:
Hi, together

Am 26.02.2011 08:29, schrieb Sophie Gautier:
Hi all,

I top post for an update on the topic.
So thanks to Christoph I'm now in contact with Matt Evans who is
director of QA at Mozilla.
He kindly offers to answer any questions we could have on Litmus or
any other things they do at Mozilla QA. He also informs me that the
new tool which will replace Litmus is at its beginning stage and
won't be ready before some time. It will be announced to the public
in a couple of weeks.
So - as i understand this, we could use Litmus for our work?

I'll propose him that we follow and help the development by
providing feedback and inputs on the features, so if you are
interested by that just tell me I'll add you in the loop. I find it
important for us that we are not alone to support the tools we use.
+1

So I think we should go on with Litmus *now*. It seems that the
error has vanished (good news :) so we may extend the tests and the
languages and see how it runs for us?
David are we ready to change from staging to [extensive ;)] general
use?
Rimas have you any concerns about this?
Others are you ready to go?

My question to this:
Is there a person who knows something more about Litmus?
What, if someone have questions - do we have supporters?

We are our best supporters ;-) more seriously, Matt has offered to answer the questions we may have so if we don't find the answer by ourselves, we'll ask him. Jean-Baptiste will write some documentation during the week end on the process and I'll translate it on the wiki so I hope we will be able to answer most of your questions.

As i login into the side "Run Tests - Your Chosen Test Run", i as myself
which of the three Radiobuttons "Which of the required criteria matches
your configuration?" should i choose? Why is this important.
And why should i choose "Extra configuration information:" ?

Who is the person that i ask for this questions?

See above, we need to help ourself here :) Don't hesitate to ask your questions because that will help us to write the documentation (unfortunately the users documentation is not available on the Litmus site [1]). For your other question concerning the linking of test documents, as said in the previous mails there could be different solutions, and we need to decide together the one we choose. Would you open a Litmus wiki page with all your questions? We will add also Rimas concerns concerning the naming, and everything that will be reported by the testers. I hope with this we will be able to build the process that best fit our needs. As a side note, I'm also in quest of some sponsoring to manage the tool but with no answer for the moment (but I keep my fingers crossed ;)

[1]https://wiki.mozilla.org/Litmus

Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.