On 2/3/11 5:25 PM, David Nelson wrote:
I read this as a request to take the pages out of circulation, so I
complied with your wish.
Hi David, you are right, my statement was too strong, and in fact you
have done what I did request. In a sense, it was my fault.
Please keep in mind, though, that I am not the project, but a member of
the project, and there should always be some consensus before changing
the current situation.
I do understand your later clarifications. Perhaps we should just put
the pages back online when they've been further developed and looked
at by you? Or what are your suggestions in this respect?
Yes, I think that the pages should be online after WE have had a look at
them and reached a consensus based on several factors, and not only on
theoretical thinking about users.
Thanks, Italo
--
Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation
E-mail: italo.vignoli@documentfoundation.org
Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli - GTalk: italo.vignoli@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Re: [libreoffice-website] Work on the "Why?" pages · Stefan Weigel
Re: [libreoffice-website] Work on the "Why?" pages · Michael Wheatland
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.