Can you tell me where does this come from? Where this decision
has been discussed and taken and by whom? The fact that we don't
use the OOo site is to satisfy a request that has nothing to do
We are an open source project, why should we prevent somebody to
contribute for whatever reason? what are the criteria for the
quality you're talking about, where are they written, who is the
person giving the approval? That would be funny that people could
contribute to OOo but not to LibO...
It is a work in progress. We will be consulting with all of the
stakeholders once things settle down and LibO3.3 has been released.
Rest assured we will be able to change things once a community
consensus has been reached.
We did not want to move focus away from the important areas of
community development at the moment. Hence the comment previously.
I must say that I'm left perplexed by all this. Michael, would you mind
- who is "We" as "we did not want to move focus away"
- why this secrecy? Do you remember it's an open source project?
- "we will be consulting with all of the stakeholders... " so let me
rephrase: you're doing something apparently in secret then will
battle hard to defend it in front of the community? That's about the
most unproductive thing I can think of here, and it reminds me of the
Drupal misunderstanding. Nobody has ever talked about an extension
store/website, although it's definitely something we need to address.
But working this way around just does not help.
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy