Wheatbix wrote:
I think that a more appropriate location for these wiki pages would be
on the soon to be created wiki.libreoffice.org rather than The
Document Foundation wiki.
Remember that the TDF wiki is not for LibreOffice information or
support, it is for community building and development.
I was thinking about this yesterday, and IMO create a whole new wiki is not
the best move: if you are worry by the fact TDF will in the future promote
more projects, this could be easily solved by "meta-tags". For example,
adding a [[Category:LibreOffice]] to the pages about LibO (and
[[Category:other-project]] to the others) should be enough to maintain
order.
But what I see as a real mistake is this:
Stefan Weigel wrote:
The LibO wiki will have separate subdomains for each language, which
means a completely different concept and structure to what we have now.
I think the content on the different locales must be the same whenever
possible, and separate the wiki on different language subdomains defeat the
idea of "content coherence": IMO, the way in which TDF wiki is set up now is
the only possibility for a healthy multilingual project because it easy the
"interaction" between languages.
Just my 2¢
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Wiki-Two-new-pages-tp2145610p2151592.html
Sent from the Website mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.