Hi Ivan, *,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Ivan M. <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com> wrote:
The work is of course not done, eye-candy is missing, and a revised
theme is in the works.
Could you please elaborate on this? I haven't seen any official
decision on the design list regarding this...
Oh, I thought it was clear that the general view is "too much text",
not visually appealing enough, also it was made pretty clear that
people don't like the side-navigation as it is now (too narrow to fit
longer texts for example) and other minor things.
And AFAIK the proposals were sent to the design list already (I
probably should subscribe to the design list as well)
On a completely different note, I'm getting an invalid certificate
warning when I open libreoffice.org in Minefield (Firefox 4.0b9pre) -
I've uploaded a screenshot at [1]
Ah, yes - I don't notice anymore since I added a permanent exception
to ignore this warning.
I'll ping cloph about getting a dedicated certificate also for libreoffice.org
ciao
Christian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-website] Merry Christmas! - My present for you: test is gone, site went live :-) (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.