Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi again,

2010/11/4 Volker Merschmann <>

He would recommend to do without a WYSIWYG editor as there is none
which works really.
Manuel said that this is the reason that the Wikipedia also hasn't
one. The best workin thing is the toolbar he added yesterday.

Actually I was looking at the code generated by the actual editor and is
quite ugly... terrible indeed :S But I understand is difficult for users to
write in mediawiki format... mmm... I see no solution here. Wikipedia has a
very nice little, very little bar that inserts the tags on the text, instead
of generating it a visually interpret them. There is no a little more
complete editor with those features? Not generating, just inserting the



E-mail to for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.