Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 2010-10-20 00:17, Benjamin Horst a écrit :
>  But I'm surely not the only one who will make that decision. Again to
>  stress it: It is the content editors/native-lang people basically
>  who'll work with it, so it needs to be easy to use for/them/, not
>  nice for the admin.
>  If both is combined, the better, but if the UI for the user sucks,
>  then sorry, you're out of the game.
I agree, but the Drupal UI is strong, so I don't see the problem.


We should also consider that Drupal has a great arsenal of modules that could add value to the TDF/LibO website. Not to mention dev support of 3,746 devs as well as their support forums (http://drupal.org/), on the other hand, Silverstripe (http://silverstripe.org) offers a very sparse amount of 3rd party add-ons (http://silverstripe.org/stable-download/).

Marc


--
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.