Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
June 2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Astron, Mirek,

On 2012-06-21 at 14:48 +0200, Stefan Knorr wrote:

hrm... this voting is quite clear: currently it is at 26:11:2
(opaque:partly opaque:transparent).
There are two factors that work against the transparency:
* Mirek didn't pick the ideal screenshot to illustrate transparency (my
view, feel free to disagree)
* Some people might just be very change-averse

There are two factors of which I have no idea how they factor in:
* The people on the G+ page are probably generally rather techy and
design-interested, but it can't be said to be representative
* It's just screenshots/mockups, nothin with which people can interact

Still, I guess, the figures would not change too much even with all
factors taken into account (IANAP*, though). How much we want to honour
this voting, I don't know...
At this point, would it be safer to go back to one of Mirek's earlier
mock-ups (at least for 3.6), then?

I already have the code for the opaque menu, and I like it :-)

http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/design-list/toolbar-opaque.png

[it is against an older version, need to do the reverts and push this
still to 3.6].

Further tweaking is still possible (if necessary), but hopefully this
works for all :-) - if no objections, I'll push it to 3.6 on Monday.

All the best,
Kendy


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.