Hi all,
hrm... this voting is quite clear: currently it is at 26:11:2
(opaque:partly opaque:transparent).
There are two factors that work against the transparency:
* Mirek didn't pick the ideal screenshot to illustrate transparency (my
view, feel free to disagree)
* Some people might just be very change-averse
There are two factors of which I have no idea how they factor in:
* The people on the G+ page are probably generally rather techy and
design-interested, but it can't be said to be representative
* It's just screenshots/mockups, nothin with which people can interact
Still, I guess, the figures would not change too much even with all
factors taken into account (IANAP*, though). How much we want to honour
this voting, I don't know...
At this point, would it be safer to go back to one of Mirek's earlier
mock-ups (at least for 3.6), then?
Astron.
* I am not a psychiatrist.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.