On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 07:40 +0200, Robert Großkopf wrote:
Hi Harvey,
Yes, my output ends similarly, but there are no entries like the
'(supported, searched)' against any of the 3 versions.
Does that mean I have a v1 processor and the support for v1 has
been
removed with LO 26.2 onward?
....hmm, not very environmentally friendly if I have to throw my
old
working configurations onto the rubbish tip. Hoping that is not
yet
necessary, before I also have to leave the scene. My Dell desktop
is
proving to be very robust.
Hope the following will show it right way:
The building of packages will be made on a system, where
x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)
is the result. So you need a system with the same minimum to use the
packages.
You could cretae your own packages of the source Code of LO and it
will
work.
I would prefer to use the latest packages of LO 25.8., because you
will
need this for your database.
Hi Robert,
all I understand is that the LO packages must be built for
compatibility with my version of x86-64 processors. The role of those 3
empty subfolders and the significance of the '(supported, search)'
flags, I can only make a vague guess.
Harvey
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.