Le 10/03/2017 à 09:44, Fiorenza Meini a écrit :
Hi Fiorenza,
The only difference we can see, is that if I give the command "type
libreoffice5.2 on the working account, I see "hashing done on
libreoffice5.2 (/usr/bin/libreoffice5.2)".
If I give the same commando the NON WORKING account, I see:
libreoffice5.2 is /usr/bin/libreoffice5.2.
The behaviour isn't the same !
What does mean "hashing done" ? Perhaps is this the problem ?
At a guess, the DEB package that points to /usr/bin/libreOffice5.2 is
hashed for installation security reasons (part of the signing of the
packages) and this hash is verified when a user attempts to execute a
program from that link.
In the non-functional user accounts, the hash isn't verified, so the
application isn't executed (I'm just speculating here, don't take my
word as gospel).
This kind of rings a bell as a Ubuntu bug I read about a while ago where
some user accounts when created did not have an appropiate set up of
executable links to libreoffice - some kind of problem with /etc/skel
not copying everything or setting correct permissions for the newly
created user.
Perhaps you might find something by searching in the Ubuntu launchpad
bug database ?
Alex
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.