On February 28, 2017 10:51:53 AM V Stuart Foote wrote:
Several, but at its core PS Type 1 fonts have been on borrowed time
since TrueType and OpenType were implemented.
The same argument could be used of TrueType fonts.
Users should have replaced or converted their fonts.
Why should they, when support for them remains?
Of note, due to
lack of PS Type 1 support in DirectWrite/Direct2D layout Microsoft
dropped Type 1 font use from Office 2013.
What about GIMP, Krita, Inkscape, and other free software, all of which
still support Type 1 fonts? These are applications that LibreOffice
users are likely to interact with.
Yes, Type 1 fonts are no longer state of the art. However, they remain
usable, and, if nothing else, are important for legacy documents. Many
designers have invested substantially in Type 1 fonts over the years,
and this decision leaves them stranded.
That said, anyone affected by this decision might be interested in the
chart of free font equivalents for proprietary fonts that I drew up
about a year ago:
http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/Free-equivalents-for-standard-proprietary-fonts
Any additions to this table would be welcome.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.