I think I was too easily persuaded on this matter. As I think about it
further, I think LO is treating the outline numbering wrongly. I've
compared LO with LaTeX and LaTeX treats the heading numbering differently.
Let's keep it simple for my illustration. In LO, let's say I have three
heading styles (Heading 1, Heading 2, and Heading 3). If I put them in
order, I get (properly):
1. Heading 1
1.1 Heading 2
1.1.1 Heading 3
This corresponds to LaTeX's Section, Subsection, and Subsubsection
environments, which appear as follows (again properly):
1. Section
1.1 Subsection
1.1.1 Subsubsection
But, if I switch the second and third headings, LO and LaTeX provide
different results. In LO, I get
1. Heading 1
1.1.1 Heading 3
1.2 Heading 2
but, with LaTeX, I get,
1. Section
1.0.1 Subsubsection
1.1 Subsection
I think LaTeX's treatment is mathematically more correct. Until I actual
use the second heading, it's value should remain "0", which is reflected
in LaTeX's second example. But, LO gives it a value of "1" even though
I've not yet used it. Thus, in LO, my first use of the second Heading is
given a value of "2" as in 1.2, whereas in LaTeX, my first use of the
second heading is given a value of 1 as in 1.1.
I think LaTeX has it right.
I tried changing the starting value of Heading 2 to "0", but that messes
things up when I use the levels in order, so that's not the solution.
Funny thing is that I've just noticed this behavior. I don't recall
seeing this happen in earlier versions of LO. I'm currently using 4.4.5.2.
In fact, I just loaded two LO documents, one an old one where the
numbering acts like LaTeX, and a newer one, where the numbering acts
like the current LO. My outline numbering settings are the same and my
styles are similar (with different names). For the life of me I can find
no setting between the two documents that is different that could
explain the different style of outline numbering. I'll keep looking, but
for now, it's just weird.
I've noticed other strange behavior with LO's outline numbering.
Sometimes, the "Position" settings are in terms of the "width of the
numbering." At other times, it is in terms of what is placed after the
number, a space, tab, or nothing.
curiouser and curiouser.
Virgil
On 09/27/2015 03:55 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
On 09/27/2015 06:42 AM, libreoffice-ml.mbourne@spamgourmet.com wrote:
I think skipping outline numbering levels, in this case from level 1
(Heading 1) to level 6 (Outline 1) implicitly inserts the
intermediate levels for numbering purposes. It's more obvious with
styles which show all the numbering levels. e.g. if you were to
insert a Heading 5 after the Heading 1, it is numbered 2.1.1.1.1, as
if there were a 2.1, 2.1.1 and 2.1.1.1 in between. Thus the next
Heading 2 inserted is 2.2:
1. Heading 1
1.1.1.1.1 Heading 5
1.1.1.1.2 Heading 5
2. Heading 1
2.1.1.1.1 Heading 5
2.2 Heading 2
Mark.
Thanks. That makes sense. So my problem was trying to combine heading
and outline styles in a single series of 10 outline levels. My outline
styles essentially became subordinate heading styles.
Virgil
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.