Hi :)
Just to deal with just 1 of those points ...
There is an archive of older releases so people can download
out-of-date
versions if they want to.
It's not widely publicised (to avoid confusing people) but when people
ask
this mailing list, and presumably other forums too, someone does
inevitably
point them in the right direction. It's also possible to find out from
the
archives or by searching the site.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 10 October 2014 18:36, alphacrash <v837502@att.net> wrote:
Please can we move on... Charles S. (aka Tanstaafl) was given
instructions and has agreed to do what needs to be done and review
the
corrected function for his use case with a current build of master
(4.4.0alpha0+)--and respond in the fdo#76565 BZ issue regards the
UX
regression.
Every thing else is just hubris or a poor understanding of the
project's
timed release development flow. Please let it go--most users on
this ML
have NO interest in this thread other than the drama. -- Stuart
Actually, this type of discussion points to a process issue. I
imagine it
is one of the reasons for having this site.
It's obvious the functionality list of Libreoffice is becomming
overwhelming. The issue of lost functionality upon which user's
have come
to rely combined with the unavailability of previous versions on the
Libreoffice website affects LibreOffice across the board. One can
struggle
with the question for the motive for this.
Regardless of the outcome of that discussion, *there is a potential
HUGE
conflict of interest looming on the horizon in the form of creating
bugs so
that outside companies can charge $$$ to fix them. *
QUESTION:
Does there exist a set of LibreOffice TEST documents that are
designed to
test ALL OF THE FUNCTIONALITY of a given version of LibreOffice?
Specifically, one that can automate test, perhaps through macros or
self
contained programs, all the functionality of Libreoffice?
SUGGESTION #3: If such a set of documents or test harness does NOT
EXIST.
Perhaps the QA team could itemize all the functionality of a version
of
Libreoffice and structure a project for contribution by end users to
contribute the tests. i.e: A test suite that each useer could
download
and
then run and/or contribute more.
SUGGESTION #4: If a test harness is too complicated, could the QA
team
make
an itemized list of all the functionality of LibreOffice, inherited
and
otherwise *and create some sort of method to crowd source the testing
in a
manner designed to capture any lost functionality*? i.e.: a
project
website for each version LibreOffice with the 100,000 things that
LibreOffice can do where the users can test each one and report the
test?
NOTE: This is different than just putting a new version out and
seeing who
gets hurt. Remember, not all people live in countries where
employers have
to make a case to the government for firing a person. Yes, there are
plenty
of disclaimers on the software, but the current process may end up
making
LibreOffice the sofware you use only for NON-CRITICAL documents. The
long-term user base effects should be obvious.
Regards,
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-handle-regressions-tp4124391p4125382.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
be
deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.