Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 10/1/2014 11:18 AM, Werner <> wrote:
On 10/1/2014 17:03, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/1/2014 9:25 AM, Werner <> wrote:
On 10/1/2014 14:47, Tanstaafl wrote:
I didn't file it (it was already filed), but it is:
Have you tested the daily build which included the patch committed on


What you are responsible for 60+ PC's and you are not willing to test on 
a test PC a potential fix to a problem which is serious to you?

I didn't say I wasn't willing, or even hadn't. I said it is irrelevant
to the fact that this massively major regression has caused us to be
unable to update past the 4.1.x series, ie, for the last two MAJOR
version releases.

As I said: I cannot install 'Daily builds' on 60+ PCs.

To the one who suggested that it is on us users to 'prod the devs to do
the back-porting'... seriously? Really? PLONK

I guess that is your reaction to someone not agreeing with you,

No, it is my reaction to someone who suggests something that is
ludicrous on its face.

That said, maybe you didn't mean it as it sounded, so I'll give you the
benefit of the doubt...

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.