Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
It's not us copying them. The "Service Pack" idea is just their name for
something other people were already using.

Actually the Sp idea is a bit different from what happens with LO.

With LO it's easy to download the whole upgrade so that for new installs
you only have to install just the 1 thing.

By contrast with the Sp idea you keep using the old installer, then apply
updates and reboot, and maybe more updates and maybe more reboots and then
apply the Service Pack and reboot and more updates and more reboots and
then the next Service Pack and on and on.  Eventually  a new installer
appears with the SPs bundled in but then the license key becomes a
problem.


I  think that's one reason people who are new to OpenSource get a bit
confused.  They don't start with say,
4.1.0 and then apply tons of updates, patches and Service Packs to end up
with the 4.1.6

So maybe it is difficult for them to understand the difference between a
4.1.6 and a 4.2.0.  Plus the maths challenge that
4.2    >   4.1
so it's intuitive (but wrong) that 4.2.0 'must be' greater than 4.1.6.  I
don't think anyone has found a good way around that.  People try using
names such as "Precise Pangolin" but that gets even more confusing.

Regards from
Tom :)




On 22 June 2014 20:27, Luuk <luuk34@gmail.com> wrote:

On 22-6-2014 18:10, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
It's that 3rd digit that indicates stability.

It's like the "Service Pack"s for MS programs.  Many companies never
consider installing any MS programs until at least Sp1 or Sp2.  Similarly
many of us keep "production machines" on earlier branches.  I keep most of
my colleagues on 3.5.7 - although i do keep meaning to upgrade them to a
more recent x.x.6.


The LO-people should stop copying behaviour of MS.

MS is no standard.
MS is not following standards.
MS is only copying standards, and adapting them to their own standards.

MS is like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZEJ4OJTgg8

;-)




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.