Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
It's just a "just for fun" survey of what people think they use.

The modules can't be split up and removing any wouldn't reduce the
code=base by much at all so the usual sinister hidden-agendas behind this
sort of question are entirely absent.  It's just for fun.

For a lot of us this sort of thing is very difficult because answering
would require us have really measured usage and give accurate answers
rather than guesses.  It's the type of question that neurotypicals and
mainstream-press articles seem to enjoy but that are ultimately fairly
pointless.  It's just for fun and it's interesting to see people's
estimates of what they do and to see how they handle giving answers to this
sort of thing.
http://musingsofanaspie.com/2013/01/10/what-is-neurotypical/

If we wanted a formal vote then there are various tools such as "Survey
Monkey", or we could set-up something in LinuxQuestions.Org" or "Ask LO" or
somewhere.
Regards from
Tom :)


On 13 May 2014 06:06, Tom Cloyd <tomcloydmsma@gmail.com> wrote:

On 05/11/2014 03:53 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:

I'm curious to find out what components of LO are used most by the
people on this list. I think it helps to know different folks' area of
experience. It might also help us in learning new ways to integrate
the different components. For myself, my approximate usage is:

Writer     (85% of my use of LO)
Calc        (10%)
Impress  (3%, Maybe four to five presentations a year)
Base       (once a year to print out labels for my Christmas cards)
Draw      (What's that?)

Virgil



 Virgil,

I have a considerable background in inferential statistics, and have done
formal survey research, in a variety of social and cultural contexts. I
want to warn you that this sort of self-select, opt-in survey is NOT the
way to go, if your question is serious.

You ARE only going to get a subset (sample) of your population of
interest, and you'll have no way to relate that subset to the population,
thus no way to draw any valid conclusions from the subset. It's
pseudo-research, which creates the impression of creating knowledge without
actually doing so.

Just something for you, and others, to think about.

Hope it's helpful.

Tom

--




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd, MS MA (LMHC, WA State)
Cedar City / St. George, UT, U.S.A: (435) 272-3332
* << tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website)
* Sleight of Mind blog: Sleightmind.com (mental health issues)
* Founder: Google+ Trauma and Dissociation Education and Advocacy community
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.