On 04/07/2014 07:50 AM, CVAlkan wrote:
Your point is valid, but only in today's context.
It's hard to remember that, back then, the idea of actually "storing" your
document on one of those computer contraptions was somewhat left of absurd.
If the document was important, or even if it needed to be retained for legal
reasons, it would have been put in the traditional and reliable storage
mechanism known as a "file cabinet." Even back then, floppies were regularly
reused after the document was "done." And the idea that hard drives would be
available for less than a gazillion dollars per megabyte (and what the heck
was a megabyte anyway?). So, the best format was a silly and irrelevant
discussion.
Yes, the official copies were the ones printed out not on the floppy.
The only things the new-fangled computer was good for (at least in terms of
word processing) were permitting changes without using White-Out,
automatically performing word wrap, and such things - and, remember, for
secretaries and typists, these were AMAZING capabilities. And did any of
them have the slightest suspicion that they were looking at what would
become their replacements? When was the last time you saw a typing pool? (if
you don't recall, that was where the typists went swimming during their
lunch breaks).
LOL about the typing pool
Also, when computer thingies became fairly common most older
professionals (mostly men) were miserable typists. Into the 80's one of
the most difficult skills for the military to find was typing because
very few boys learned to type. So anyone who could type moderately
decently became the company clerk; it was too valuable a skill to waste
on being a rifleman.
Thus, screen space was quite important. Back then, the concentration was on
improving the generation and presentation of documents.
So - if you were kidding, I apologize for responding seriously. We often
forget that, back in the dark past, Ken Olsen (DEC) couldn't conceive of
anyone ever having a computer in their home (what would he have thought
about "in their pocket"?). And Bill Gates famously said he couldn't see any
need for more than 16k of memory (he seems to have changed his mind over
time).
DEC no longer exists. I think their remains were bought by Compaq; now
part of HP.
Have a great week ...
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Microsoft-Revisits-the-80s-With-MS-DOS-Word-for-Windows-Source-Code-tp4103960p4104377.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · Marcello Romani
[libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · James Knott
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · Italo Vignoli
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · Jay Lozier
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · CVAlkan
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · Jay Lozier
Re: [libreoffice-users] Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · Marcello Romani
Re: [libreoffice-users] Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · James E Lang
Re: [libreoffice-users] Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, · James E Lang
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.