Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO compatibility

e-letter <inpost -AT- gmail.com>
Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:41:24 +0000

On 16/03/2014, Jim Seymour <jseymour@linxnet.com> wrote:


Practical implementations of a proposed standard are wonderful, but,
before it's part of the standard, documents written with such
extensions are, _by definition_, non-standard formats.


It's a worry that some users prefer new "features" over standards
compliance and quality control.

In my opinion: LibréOffice ought not be writing documents, by
default, in non-standard formats.


Agree, it means that if a user is concerned about compatibility, they
must understand to disable the default settings in LO.

How does OO compare; are documents created to the odf standard by default?

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO compatibility (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.