Jim Seymour wrote
This is all rather unbecoming, don't you guys think?
Not really. This is just the two extremist sides of the ODF vs MS-formats.
There are indeed some users (not Tanstaafl) who just want a free office
suite that perfectly supports MS-formats (and don't care about free file
formats as long as they can get the software for free as in beer). And there
are the ODF fundamentalists (like e-letter) that say that LO should only
support MS-formats for Import and even so that developers shouldn't waste
too much time on that :)
The problem here, as I see it, is that ODF is still in it's infancy. E.g.
only recently ODF (under LibreOffice 4.1) started supporting font embedding
which is an essential feature for anyone working with vector graphics,
custom presentations or simply elegant text documents. MS supports font
embedding since Word 6.0 (back in 1993!!!)
LO and ODF are evolving quite fast but there is still a long way to go.
Just my 2 cents ;)
View this message in context:
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy