I believe I read somewhere that it was the law firm that MS had hired that
was using WordPerfect.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Knott
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:42 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Defending ODF against OOXML in the UK
Virgil Arrington wrote:
A few years ago, most lawyers in the U.S. used WordPerfect, and they
really liked it. It had some features that were very suitable for the
law office. However, most of their corporate clients were using Word.
(Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft). Over time, law offices
began migrating to Word, not because they liked the program better,
but because they needed file compatibility with their clients. Now,
WordPerfect is all but an afterthought.
After one of one of the anti-trust cases, Microsoft received a large
document in WP format. They had to go out and buy a copy of Word
Perfect, to read that document. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.