Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Defending ODF against OOXML in the UK

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:16:50 -0500
Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:

> On 2014-02-24 1:10 PM, e-letter <inpost@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You are unaware of the numbers of m$ fans that pollute this list
> > demanding that the priority of LO is not to produce high quality
> > native odf output,
>
> Never ever seen anyone say anything like that...
>
> > but instead to produce perfect m$ documents.
>
> Definitely seen people say this should be a priority, but not a
> higher priority than for ODF documents.
>
> On the other hand, I have seen *you* say crap like LO shouldn't even 
> support MS office file formats at all, which is pure rabid anti-MS
> rubbish.

This is all rather unbecoming, don't you guys think?

Regards,
Jim
-- 
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering.  If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted