[libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

Il 03/02/2014 17:47, Kracked_P_P---webmaster ha scritto:
> On 02/03/2014 08:48 AM, Marcello Romani wrote:
> > Il 03/02/2014 13:21, IOmazic ha scritto:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is it possible that you share this tools for windows? I will need to
> > > install
> > > it to around 450 pc, so it will be cool to have some tool to do all
> > > modification needed.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Ivan Omazic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Ivan Omazic
> > > IT Assistant / Technical Lead
> > > iomazic@wmo.int
> > > +41 22 730 81 55
> > > +41 79 918 34 26
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-deployment-tp4077035p4095225.html
> > >
> > > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > This might prove a useful starting point:
> >
> > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=28765&start=0
>
> Why are people still sending others to the OpenOffice.org web site for
> information about LibreOffice?
>
> For this posted need, I remember hearing about "deployment" of LO on a
> LO web page.  Although LO was a fork of OOo from several years ago, it
> is "grown" past those roots now.  If we do not have the needed
> documentation now, we should really make it a priority to set up a web
> site/page to talk about IT management deployment of LO, including
> network based.
>
> The current AOO/OOo web site should not be the place where people go to
> get information about LO.  From a marketing aspect, this could lead
> business users to think we are not the package to use, but AOO is.  That
> is wrong way of doing "business".
>
> SO, just from the marketing aspect to businesses, this needs to be
> resolved.  From the typical user, this could be an issue as well.
>
> I stopped using OOo when LO came out.  I do not want to have to explain
> to users that LO's documentation site[s] is not the place to find the
> needed information to migrate/deploy LO to their systems.
>
> Would you tell the UK tech advisors to not consider LO for the open
> source option to using the mandated ODF file format requirements, but to
> go with AOO/OOo since we do not have the needed documentation?  We would
> be saying this if we tell them to go to the OOo web site for the
> deployment information.
>
> I see too many of these postings telling users to go to the OOo site[s]
> for the needed information or extension/template download.  Yes, there
> may be something there that LO currently does not have, but it should
> not be the first option.  LO needs to rely on LO's sites to give the
> user the help and support they need.
>
> I do not use Nabble, but I would think that there must be a forum there
> about business migration and deployment.  IF not, then there should be.
>
> Am I alone in this opinion?


Googled for a solution.
Found an interesting thread.
Thought it could be useful to the OP.
Posted it.

I don't get what all this whining is about.

Is there LO-specific information around, or some tutorial that doesn't 
involve OO? Fine, somebody is goind to come up with it (you didn't, by 
the way. Just sayin')
As an example, V Stuart Foote provided a more general solution to the OP 
problem in this same thread.

--
Marcello Romani

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted