I suspect that at least part of the problem here is that it is sometimes difficult to see -
especially with an inherited document - exactly how formatting has been applied and consequently
how it might be removed.
The problem is that _some_ formatting seems to get "stuck." This is either an implementation bug
or, for some obscure reason, a design decision; which makes it a design bug.
Named styles are exclusive. Even though a style is _based_ on another style, recursively, applying
a named style overrides the previous named style, whether the old style is an ancestor of the new
style, or a completely different beast. That should be that as far as applying named styles goes.
All that should be left is any "style fragments" that one has applied from the toolbar: bold,
italic, etc; left, centered, etc; a particular font and so on. That may include bits of format
applied through a format>paragraph or format>character menu, _provided_ that all of this formatting
is removed by the 'Clear direct formatting' operation. _Everything_ else must be reset to the
values defined (or defaulted) in the applied style.
This should not be a problem. If you like the look of some styling, create a new named style from
the selection. Then extend and modify as required. That's what styles are all about.
The other thing is to clearly display the interaction of paragraph and list styles. The style name
display should have the capacity to display ALL the named styles that are in play, and there should
be a display option, similar to the 'Display special characters' button, to toggle 'Show direct
formatting.'
It all boils down to being able to determine the source of any formatting, and being able, easily,
to reset all formatting to a named style or set of complementary style types; paragraph, character,
list.
And yes, your discussion does help.
Peter West
...he saw a poor widow put in two copper coins.
On 29 Nov 2013, at 4:44 am, Brian Barker <b.m.barker@btinternet.com> wrote:
I still don't understand why you consider any of this a difficulty. If you have a mixture of
direct formatting along with character and paragraph styles, you may well wish to remove some
parts of it, but not all. So it's useful to have more than one facility. Surely you would
expect to need to remove the different parts of applied formatting separately - and delight that
you were able to do so selectively.
As far as I can see:
o Format | Default Formatting removes both direct formatting (to characters or paragraphs) and
formatting by character styles.
o The Apply Style drop-down applies paragraph styles, so you'd expect "Clear formatting" there to
reset the paragraph style to Default - and it does. But it also does the same as Format |
Default Formatting as well.
I suspect that at least part of the problem here is that it is sometimes difficult to see -
especially with an inherited document - exactly how formatting has been applied and consequently
how it might be removed.
I trust this helps.
Brian Barker
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? (continued)
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · Brian Barker
- [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · pbw
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · Tom Davies
- (message not available)
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · Brian Barker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · Brian Barker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · A
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · Tom Davies
- [libreoffice-users] Re: A feature, or ...? · Peter West
- Re: [libreoffice-users] A feature, or ...? · Peter West
- Re: [libreoffice-users] A feature, or ...? · Steve Edmonds
Re: [libreoffice-users] A feature, or ...? · Virgil Arrington
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.