On 7/16/2013 2:02 AM, Felmon Davis wrote:
The translation, of course, is, "Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews"
and if he was truly King of the Jews, it could be argued that this was
insurrection against Roman authority, but Biblically, it would seem that
this is what the Jews accused him of stating, since they complained
to Pilate that the sign should read, "He _said_ he was King of the
Jews." And Pilate replied, "What I have written, I have written."
Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum
I just read today that according to one author, this was supposed to
be a description of his 'crime', viz. insurrection against Roman
anyway, off topic; my apologies.
BTW, the first Latin Senatus PopulusQue Romanus had Populus misspelled.
Sorry about that.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy