Forgive my ignorance, but I'm trying to understand what you're saying. You
In essence, this boils down to the fact that all sane document
processing applications (whether Wordperfect, Framemaker or dozens
of others, LaTeX or anything that outputs structured XML) use nestable
open- and close-"tags", while Word and LO/OO don't.
I've created my own paragraph styles, and I have one called "BodySingle."
It's just a single-spaced body of text with no paragraph indents. When I
create a document in WordPerfect (an old Version 7) and look at a document
in reveal codes, I get a code that says, for example, "Para Style:
BodySingle" before each paragraph that has BodySingle applied to it and the
same code at the end of each paragraph with that style.
When I look at a similar document in LO's "content.xml" file, I see "<text:p
text:style-name="BodySingle">" before each BodySingle paragraph and a
</text:p> at the end of each paragraph.
The only real difference I see is that LO ends each paragraph with a more
generic tag </text:p:> with no specific reference to the applied style
whereas WordPerfect ends each paragraph with a specific reference to the
Is that the distinction you're making between the two methods, and if so,
how does that matter?
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Book-writing with Writer · Wolfgang Keller
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Book-writing with Writer (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy