Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Pedro wrote:
And because the Devs think that a .0 release is trash and there wasn't
enough time or people to check this, this was bound to happen.

Hi Pedro,

we try to fix whatever major bugs get reported, and especially when
they are regressions. If you look into the bug I referenced, it was
not initially reproducible, and got escalated after the 4.0.0 release.

So I repeat my earlier statement - the best and most productive course
of action is to get involved. Give beta and rc versions a hard time,
report bugs, and help with triaging them (i.e. figure out how severe
they are, or if you can even reproduce them with your setup, and then
bring them to the attention of developers).

And as a developer, I clearly don't think the 4.0.0 is trash - in fact
it fixes a boatload of longstanding bugs, and adds lots of really
useful features. The 4.0.1, due 2nd week of March, will be even better.


-- Thorsten

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.