Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

2013/2/20 Urmas <>

 The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments have a
hilarious amount of FUD in them.  One wonders if they have ever even tried
either MSO or LO.

Most people who "own" StarOffice or many of its forks don't use it. They
just open and print documents with it. If someone tried to actually use it
as a word processor, he would find some of

5+ years old bugs and lack of features much earlier.
Nowadays there is no free alternative to MS Office suite and costly
third-party utilities: spellchecker, bibliography/formula editors and so on.

​Perhaps, Urmas, you could be more specific about the putative «​5+ years
old bugs and lack of features» in such StarOffice forks as LibreOffice ?
Otherwise, your comment must be regarded as a prime example of that FUD Tom
mentioned above....


For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.