On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:18:44PM +0600, Urmas wrote:
The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments
have a hilarious amount of FUD in them. One wonders if they have
ever even tried either MSO or LO.
Most people who "own" StarOffice or many of its forks don't use it.
They just open and print documents with it. If someone tried to
actually use it as a word processor, he would find some of 5+ years
old bugs and lack of features much earlier.
Nowadays there is no free alternative to MS Office suite and costly
third-party utilities: spellchecker, bibliography/formula editors
and so on.
That's a hilarious statement from someone posting to a list dedicated to
a free alternative to MS Office.
If you think you're getting free lunch,
check the price of the beer.
Key ID: 8D549279
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy