On 21/12/2012, NoOp <email@example.com> wrote:
On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote:
On 19/12/2012, NoOp <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
And the link to that bug report is... ?
For LO (RSS feed):
For OO: (RSS feed):
I certainly would have been willing to try to assist if you could have
pointed me to *your* bug report. But it appears that *you've* not
actually filed a report as stated... right?
Consider this a difference in opinion of the definition "report". :)
The original statement was in the description of generating a report
on existing data (in this case, bugs), not an creating a "new report"
(which seems wrong to me, the correct term should be "bug (report)".
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$ (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy