Re: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$

e-letter <inpost -AT- gmail.com>
Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:13:35 +0200

On 20/12/2012, Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com> wrote:


If I am writing code I almost certainly would not use LO but either an
IDE or an enhanced text editor. The formating I need is to highlight
syntax and possible syntactical errors as I enter the code.


Understood, but the point being made is that instead of 'record
changes', LO offers the same version control functionality for odf
documents  as plain text (e.g. LaTeX, or any programming language).

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Re: [libreoffice-users] record changes weakness compared to m$ (continued)
- [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$ · NoOp
  - Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$ · e-letter
    - [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$ · NoOp
      - Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: record changes weakness compared to m$ · e-letter

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.