-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 12-12-11 07:54 AM, VA a écrit :
I'm obviously not communicating very well. I haven't had any "conflict between configuration profiles or during
normal usage that leads to a crash or data loss" from running all three programs, so I currently have no reason to file any bug reports.
So, again, my question. Why is it not advisable to run LO and AOO on the same system? What
harm does it do to my system? Because you may have a "conflict between configuration profiles or during normal usage *that leads to a crash* or data loss". /**** THAT LEADS TO A CRASH *** <--- POSSIBLE HARM TO YOUR SYSTEM*/ (ie. software/OS normal operation) If your data isn't critical, this won't matter much. I run similar configurations on a Windows test system for example. I believe in your very first post you also indicated the forks will differ so much in the future that this won't remain practical/compatible enough. F. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: PGP/Mime available upon request Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDHPiIACgkQfUcTXFrypNWO3wCgty1y2ZczJ/8HZtzjvhoD+EDf PCwAoMB2Jc6ENouMLyV1LXTeftjSj+GD =Q0aV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted