Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 12/10/2012 10:25 PM, VA wrote:
"do not use both LO and AOO on the same system."

Why not?

Virgil


1 - I do not use AOO [or OOo before AOO came out] since I started using LO almost 2 years ago.

2 - I do not think it is wise to use two packages that are both forks from the original OOo code base, on the same system. Yes there are procedures you can do to have both packages installed on the same system, just like you can have two versions of LO installed on the same system. Just because you can do something does not mean it is something that you should do.

3 - 1 and 2 are reasons enough. Whether or not there are people who do not believe the same way that I do, this is what I believe.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.