The docx, xslx, pptx formats and others are OOXML. There are deviations as well as features (such
as encryption) that are not part of OOXML. But most of the non-support claims about Microsoft
honoring OOXML are based on the fact that early implementations supported the transitional flavor
of OOXML. The move to the strict flavor, a separation created in the ISO process, has been made
over time along with continuing support of transitional OOXML.
My experience is that deviations with respect to the OOXML standard are documented better in
Microsoft on-line implementation notes than is done by any implementations of ODF-based software.
Microsoft Office also supports ODF 1.1 since Office 2007 SP2 and ODF 1.2 is supported in the new
Office 2013. There are public, on-line implementation notes and documentation of deviations for
those too. I've also heard that European versions of Microsoft Office can be set to have ODF as
the default format. I have no way to confirm that and I am not certain that is new with Office
2013 or is also the case for Office 2010.
The main binary formats, and RTF (a text-carried format) are now all documented and that has been
true for a few years. All of the specifications are freely downloadable.
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Don C. Myers [mailto:donmyers@myersfarm.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 08:57
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: OpenOffice to be dumped in Freiburg ?
Hi Everyone,
When the Microsoft formats were approved as an ISO standard, wasn't that
supposed to make the information on their formats available to everyone
else? From what I've read through the years, they have failed to
implement their own ISO standards. Shouldn't there be some way to
enforce the ISO standards approval on Microsoft so they can become
inter-operable with LibreOffice?
Don
On 11/19/2012 08:03 AM, VA wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
"There is one more hing that could turn this around - if the EU (or some
other major governmental entity) were to engage in and win an antitrust
lawsuit against Microsoft and force them to *fully* document their file
formats, as happened with their Windows Server SMB protocols (which I
understand has benefited the Samba project immensely)."
It would help immensely if the Open Source folks would combine their
efforts on one excellent MS alternative. The twin development of AOO
and LibO (with each having its own advantages over the other), only
helps MS.
Virgil
--
**
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.