Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
Great news! :)  Thanks Gary :)  I think a lot of people had kinda given up hope of them ever 
managing to release a new version.  

Btw your 1st link got me a 
"We're sorry, the page you requested was not found."
lol.  Still the 2nd one looked great :)
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)


--- On Fri, 18/5/12, NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

From: NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 18 May, 2012, 5:02

On 5/17/2012 4:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :) I think the last official release was a 6, possibly the 6u31.
None of the 7s have made it to full official release.  

You think? Did you not bother to check the links that I provided?

Here's a few more:
<http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/44437>
http://java.com/en/download/index.jsp
"Free Java Download
Download Java for your desktop computer now!
Version 7 Update 4 "


At least 1 of
them was apparently compromised out-in-the-wild when it reached
release-candidate status. Regards from Tom :)


--- On Thu, 17/5/12, NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

From: NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re:
Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 1:32

On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding
edge application. Even then you can install a second Java 1.6 and
point the

Java 1.7_0.4 is the current recommended _released_ version of Java. 
https://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp "Recommended Version 7
Update 4" <https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/why_upgrade.xml>

You'll need to go hunting for Java 1.6 now.

Further: 
<https://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/> 
"Support for Java 7 (1.7) added. User can select between Java 6 or 7 
engine, if both are installed. "

office to that installation. In any case it has to be 32 bit
because under Windows the office is a 32 bit application.

Perhaps if you would include some quotation from the post others
could understand what you are replying to. I see nothing in the OP
that indicates 'steelej' was using a 64 bit version.







-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.