Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.5.1

Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Yes it's a bit annoying that the only version on the main downloads page was the 3.5.0 when it was 
> obviously going to be problematic.  Now that the 3.5.1 has been released it should be less of a 
> problem.
>
> People choose the latest one because that's what we give them, unless they dig around to find the more obscure options buried on back-pages. 
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
> --- On Sat, 17/3/12, e-letter<inpost@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> From: e-letter<inpost@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.5.1
> To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> Date: Saturday, 17 March, 2012, 15:49
>
> On 17/03/2012, Sharon Kimble<skimble04@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > I see that LO 3.5.1 is out now. Can anyone confirm please if these
> > showstoppers have been fixed?
> > [a] autospellcheck not working, and
> > [b] lack of recent history files.
> Have you looked at bugzilla?
>
> > I am reluctant to upgrade until I know that these showstoppers have been
> > fixed.
> Why do people always wish to be using the latest version of a software product?
>
> Have recently read a very interesting thread about regression bugs and
> (in my opinion) flawed software release strategy:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2012-March/001267.html.
> Novice mailing list users, note the consistent posting style!
I just simply think and expect latest versions have solved problems from 
previous releases.
However it is obvious that this is not true at all.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted