On 18/01/2012 at 17:12, mnatiello <mario.natiello@math.lth.se> wrote:
If you don't know about a way to modify the default... should I file an
"enhancement request?"
If it did work in the past version of OOo (as you said), you should file it as
"regression", not "enhancement". Fortunately, regressions gets more developers
attention than enhancements.
I think that would be valuable to check previous versions of OOo as well. Did
it work in 3.0.0, but not in (say) 3.1? Does changelog mention it? If changed
behavior was introduced in OOo, chances are that LO developers don't know
anything about it. In that case, perhaps it indeed is "enhancement" and not
"regression".
But please wait some time (I don't know, few days?) before posting it on
bugzilla. Maybe someone will drop by and explain things a bit.
You can also ask on developers mailing list before posting on bugzilla. Maybe
it was changed on purpose?
--
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.