Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 17/01/12 16:38, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
It's not great to be faced with these challenges and questions and no answers when people first write in to the list. It's scary. Sadly i don't think there was a way around it this time. Perhaps John has installed on a lower spec than is really needed for Ubuntu. Ubuntu really needs 15Gb hard-drive, 1GHz Cpu and 1Gb Ram. It can run in less, far less if you are an expert and do a special install but for a default and usable system it really takes about that much. Lubuntu is better on lower spec than that or Xubuntu if you are close. If one thing is lower but the rest higher then you can get away with it with Ubuntu but as a rule-of-thumb it's fairly accurate.
When i was on the Ubuntu forums i often found that people had installed the Server Edition thinking it 
would be like the desktop but more powerful.  Another common issue would be that people had been told the 
the min.spec. for installing Ubuntu was barely usable by highly experienced Gnu&Linux experts who could 
swap-out bits&bobs and do a very non-standard install.  Another common problem was people installing 
inside Windows using the Wubi installer and often again with far too little space.  I made myself fairly 
unpopular by suggesting that the official min.spec. should be plenty for a usable system for a total noob, 
ie about 15 Gb hard-drive space, not 2Gb (or whatever ridiculous claim was made).  For at least 1Gb Ram and 
1GHz Cpu rather than 256Mb Ram which is plausible only if the architecture happens to be far better than is 
likely.  Almost every product makes ridiculous claims and something i initially liked about Ubuntu was that 
it didn't but
then the year after they suddenly copied the boasting style of the rest of the corporate world.
It's also possible that John Black is not subscribed and therefore not seeing these replies
Regards from
Tom :)

--- On Tue, 17/1/12, Gordon Burgess-Parker<>  wrote:

From: Gordon Burgess-Parker<>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Problem
Date: Tuesday, 17 January, 2012, 9:01

On 16/01/12 20:56, John Black wrote:
I just installed Libre Calc and tried to run it. Got the message: ” The
application cannot be started. [context="shared"] caught unexpected

What did I do wrong? This is in Ubuntu that I installed yesterday.

Thank you


Your post makes no sense.
If you installed the latest version of Ubuntu then it already COMES with
the full Libre Office suite.
You need to tell us EXACTLY what you have and EXACTLY what you did.
(BTW, you cannot just install Calc on it's own - it's either the whole
suite or nothing).

I've just sent a copy of my mail directly to the OP. We'll see what that produces!


Registered Linux User no 240308
Say No to OOXML
I only accept odf or pdf documents

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.