On 22/12/2011, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
<webmaster@krackedpress.com> wrote:
What I do not like is when people tell others that if the files do not
come from their source, then they must [or implied that way] have
something "nasty" hidden inside.
Such people are fully justified. Previously, someone made very serious
recommendations about the poor level (i.e. synonymous with the m$
mentality) of security regarding the "service" you are providing: did
you improve the security of your web site???
As for the assumption that web sites should be considered innocent
until proven guilty: utter naive nonsense. Unless you can speak/see
people ear-to-ear/eye-to-eye, only official sources should be used.
By definition, those that want to disregard security are free to
distribute open source software as they want (even charge for it), but
there is no justification for official sources to acknowledge,
support, endorse un-official sources.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.