Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 11/29/2011 04:29 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 28/11/2011, doug<dmcgarrett@optonline.net>  wrote:
If LO becomes like Unity you will surely drive me back to Windows, where
I can use WordPerfect, whcih I prefer anyway.
Linux novices via ubuntu: please be aware that ubuntu is not
gnu/linux!!! Review the distrowatch web site and realise that there
many alternatives to consider. It would be a disappointment to observe
ubuntu fans complain, revert to m$ and forget rest of the open source
world.

As for LO user interface, this demonstrates the power of odf;
alternative word processors can be used.

Knock off the flame - the relative merits of a distro is not the real issue. The issue is how to improve the LO UI. The only reasons Unity and Gnome 3 would be important are lessons that could be used from their experiences. Note Gnome 3 is used on a number distros with acerbic comments by users about wanting classic Gnome.

--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.