On 2011-09-10, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
planas [mailto:jslozier@gmail.com] wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 21:51 +0100, Dave Howorth wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:27 -0700, NoOp wrote:
Really? I see nothing hidden here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc313071%28v=office.12%29.aspx
<http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/4/8/24862317-78F0-4C4B-B355-C7B2C1D997DB/%5BMS-OFFCRYPTO%5D.pdf>
I think the interesting bit is the following:
"Microsoft has patents that may cover your implementations of the
technologies described in the Open Specifications. Neither this notice
nor Microsoft's delivery of the documentation grants any licenses under
those or any other Microsoft patents. However, a given Open
Specification may be covered ..."
The emphasis, I feel, is on the word "may".
[...]
I noticed that Haworth left of the part after the "may be covered
... "?
Is it not good to first check to see if the specification is indeed
covered or not?
From what I recall from some USENET talks about this, it's actually
better *not* to check, as if you knowingly violate a patent, fines and
the rest are heavier than if you didn't know there was a patent.
So until the US Congress decides to abandon the power to legislate
patents and copyrights stipulated in the US Constitution, this is
pretty much as good as it gets short of MSFT not having obtained any
patents in the first place (whether or not any apply to items under
the Open Specification Promise).
We don't need the US Congress (and some other legislative branches over
the world) to stop legislating patents, we just need them to stop
screwing the definition of patent. Algorithm patenteability is a
Pandora's box that should have never been opened.
(Copyright has nothing to do with this, unless you plan to copy
Microsoft's code in some way.)
IANAL
--
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Encrypted MSO files (docx,xlsx) in Libo (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.