Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

One area where M$ Word still scores over LO is in the use of track-changes. I know many editors and authors who stay with M$ because the in-text change tracking that LO (and OO) use is much trickier to use than the in-margin alternative available in the M$ version. If the latter could be added to LO, then I can guarantee a lot more users. 

Graham
--
graham.mullan@coly.org.uk

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.