Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Graham,

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 18:23 +0100, Graham Mullan wrote: 

One area where M$ Word still scores over LO is in the use of 
track-changes. I know many editors and authors who stay with M$ because 
the in-text change tracking that LO (and OO) use is much trickier to use 
than the in-margin alternative available in the M$ version. If the 
latter could be added to LO, then I can guarantee a lot more users.

Graham
--
graham.mullan@coly.org.uk



Could post a suggestion with bugzilla https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ and
note ii is feature request. That why the devs will know about it.
-- 
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.