Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



The problem with government policies, is that they can change with each new person at the helm. If there is a guy who was one of Gate's Executives before he was asked to go into government work, then he will not be one that is motivated to keep the open-source policies of the last person in his job.

Anyone in the position of CIO for the government has clout enough to get the pro-open-source policies weakened or even changes, even if it is not in his direct control.

Then there is the Presidential and other Elections. If the current administration is voted out, then the new one can change these policies 180 degrees to cancel the move towards open source.




On 08/06/2011 02:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Although discussion of migration strategies and switching costs is interesting, I want to come back 
to the odd title of this thread.

To the best of my knowledge, what the US Federal CIO is concerned with does not directly govern 
whether or not Open Source is used in the White House.  As I recall, the current use of open-source 
predates the appointment of the outgoing Federal CIO.

I think you will find this blog helpful:<http://www.whitehouse.gov/tech>.  One great thing is the 
donation of code back to the Drupal project, the second of which occurred in February 2011.

I would be surprised to see this change under the current White House occupant.

  - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Goodman [mailto:stan.goodman@hashkedim.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 00:26
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] There goes Open-Source in the White House

On 08/06/2011 06:25 AM, planas wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 20:53 +0000, toki wrote:

On 08/05/2011 05:57 PM, upscope wrote:

our government is looking for big budget cuts. One would be replace  all the MS stuff with open 
source software.
If the united states government, or the government of the united kingdom
ruled today that effective 1 January 2012, only FLOSS may be used by the
government, and closed source, proprietary software was banned, the
budget savings would, at the earliest, be visible in 2016, and probably
not until 2020, or even 2025. This is simply due to the unbreakable
contracts various software vendors have with those governments.
Contracts that requires the vendors to be paid, regardless of whether or
not the product meets the contract specifications, assuming it is
delivered in the first place.

Long term, FLOSS saves money. Short term, it doesn't save money, and can
be described as costing money.

jonathon
--
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.

If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
requesting.

                                DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw.

Actually changing to another application/OS, etc will require a learning
curve at the beginning. The advantage that FOSS has is the primary cost
to using is the learning curve in most cases. I think often the actual
costs of switching forget if I switched from LO to KOffice I have a
learning curve, I do not know KOffice so I need to learn its quirks to
become proficient. If a purchase is involved it just adds to the cost.
Both the above responses are, of course, correct in pointing out that
switching to open software would entail costs. But nobody has suggested
junking all the Windows seats in the US Government and switching to
FOSS. It would be rational to install FOSS in newly established offices
instead of Windows, and let the phenomenon expand naturally, while
getting MS on its toes, with a visible competitor. In any case, making
the White House a subsidiary of Microsoft doesn't seem to do any good at
all.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.