There is good reason, beyond SOX, that most commercial and
non-commercial email clients default to top-posting. It's required in
the vast majority of corporations around the world.
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Posting_style
For a long time the traditional style was to post the answer below as
much of the quoted original as was necessary to understand the reply
(bottom or inline). Many years later, when email became widespread in
business communication, it became a widespread policy to reply above the
entire original and leave it untouched below the reply.
...
Top-posting has always been the standard format for forwarding a message
to a third party; in which case the comments at the top (if any) are a
"cover note" for the recipient.
...
Customer service e-mail practices, in particular, often require that all
points be addressed in a clear manner without quoting, while the
original e-mail message may be included as an attachment.
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:30 +0000, toki wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31/05/2011 17:16, Lindsay Graham wrote:
Ah, but neither of us would *ever *need to page down to see the current
post if we both top-posted.
Instead, I have to page down, and read the entire post, to try to figure
out what you are responding to, and get the context of that reply.
So instead of zipping thru twenty emails per minute, I only go through
two or three emails per minute.
You cannot claim, in a general context, that there is there is a
*proper* way of using one's mail client.
Actually, I do make that claim.
Intermixed quotes are the proper way to do things, because that is the
only format in which the context the reply being made can be readily
ascertained.
jonathon
- --
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.
If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
requesting.
DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN5XoVAAoJEERA7YuLpVrVFG4H/0Mx/+SZKodikKx/aXWrXPMG
DQn53ZFZZSr64UNXyrHjWSaYwmgQ7RgV4nG+a7hYE5lvaz7OrI9T6ebR4BSHGMl+
EIWypvIEzJhqcQUWhYTDfyYF9obgvmZWn58fD82uasBDr91wYJJCjFTu/F2ddaJU
lVk0TpL2OEXD+USsXEj1bE4ttE6qYOPQ5cEGX8RLaz9Hauv2OpLpOHUOZnCYMsGJ
lH6pfXt/XLq29VvD5BXoaponr7vjzvYXhOqMKckO+MRglkxyfn0KUuqzRpqdffd6
bHkRbu/+rAWixplRgaebqAajwACqZDxok55bM52yUY/vz7aD44trUaOGRJu/3fs=
=b9MX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol
reserves.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken · lcoluiggi
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.