NoOp <firstname.lastname@example.org> typed:
:: Your post might be better on the discuss list. That said,
:: why do you seem to think that LO needs a 'Project Manager'
I agree that Project Manager as it exists from Microsoft isn't really
something I'd want to see in Libre OR OO.o. t's a huge package and would be
a big step backward in some ways to make it part of the Suite for the few
people who would use it.
There are many alternatives avaiable, both free and pay-for that will do a
great job of project management, depending on what yhou want to get out of
it. Depending on what you need, Excel or Calc would even be usable for
project management; I've seen a few decent templates around for them.
Besides, I'm never found the MS Project Manager to be that good or that
userfriendly anyway. I live with it because it's the status quo and
"Microsoft" is a magic name to management here. That might be reasonable
too, considering the many levels of project management that existed here,
but that's another folly for another place.
Now, were TDF to take on creating a Project Manager, that might be OK. But
it looks like a lot of work that a lot of people wouldn't use rght away for
a lot of reasons.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy