Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 03/14/2011 06:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
On 3/14/11 5:40 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.

I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.

I'd suggest that Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) would be a
good fit.  It's a stable and very capable product, now an open source
application.

Integration would, of course, be a job, but as an extremely capable
application in its own right it might/should be a better place to
start than from scratch?

Regards
Mark Stanton
Mark,
Regarding "One small step for mankind..."

I love these exchanges!  Please keep them coming in!
   They're actually a BIG step for mankind.

Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) - their web site states:
[quote]
Virtual Access is a mature and well established Windows mail, news and conferencing product ......
[unquote]
What if you use Linux or Mac OSX? It would be nice to find a similar "main, news, and conferencing product" that works for Windows, Linux .deb [32/64-bit], Linux .rpm [32/64-bit], and Mac OSX.



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.